How Soon Should You Date Exclusively?

By | April 28, 2017

The Question

To find a good relationship, you first have to go through the dating process. This is littered with pitfalls.

In the real world of dating, the issue often comes down to the question of “exclusivity.”

Here is a real life case example. “Teresa” (not her real name) asked the following question:

_________________________________

“I am in love with a man who says he is not ready for an exclusive relationship. He has been totally honest with me about this from the beginning. We have been seeing each other for about 5 months.

“He was in a dysfunctional relationship and it is obvious that it scarred him deeply. He is afraid of being with only one woman because of the potential for pain. He wants to have multiple relationships.

“I have considered this but soon realized that I would not be true to myself if I did that. He had been seeing another woman very infrequently up until a few months ago when I became upset about it. When asked if he was sexual with her he said “yes.” I said that I would not have sex with him as long as he was being sexual with another. I told him I thought it was best for me to be open to seeing others.

“I now see one other man on occasion. The first man tells me that he is not seeing anyone else but is still not ready. We are doing the things that couples do, so what he says vs. what he does seems incongruent. I could go on and on… basically I am conflicted about what to do. I have told him that what we are doing is OK for the short term but ultimately I want a deeper connection with someone – preferably him.

What should I do?”

_____________________________________

Teresa’s question is very common. But before giving you my response, I want to give you some background information about the phases and stages of dating, that will help put my answer in perspective.

Phases of Dating

First let me describe the different phases during the dating process. Although there is overlap between these phases, it is instructive to know the basic nature of them. One could no doubt define more or fewer phases than I have done, but I think the model I describe below is very functional and easy to remember and understand.

Phase 1 – “Readiness” (pre-dating). This phase involves getting your own house in order. This should include creating a vision for your life and a prioritized list of your relationship requirements. It should also include gaining new perspectives, learning new attitudes and behaviors, and otherwise building emotional maturity (emotional maturity is the ability to deal constructively with the problems of life, including finding and keeping a quality relationship). This readiness stage could also include “recreational dating” (dating for fun, companionship, and practice, as opposed to dating with the purpose in mind of finding a life partner).

Phase 2 – “Dating.” I identify the following three stages in the dating phase:


Stage 1 – “Infatuation.” This is where fantasy and wishes reign over reality. Infatuation feels like real love, so it can be very deceptive. This stage can last up to three months, or more if there is infrequent in-person contact. The end of the infatuation stage can be marked by confusion and pain when you realize that your hopes and what felt to be so real were actually a house of cards. Relationships in this stage should not be exclusive as this can lead to disappointment and difficulty in extracting yourself from the relationship.


Stage 2 – “Sincere Interest” (also known as “sincere uncertainty”). If the relationship passes out of the infatuation stage, it probably means there is real interest (though some relationships stay together out of fear or guilt). But there is still a lot of uncertainty, and usually some degree of disenchantment. This is the “testing” phase, and may last six months to two years or more. The partners are learning more about the chemistry balance, the maturity balance, the possibilities for growth, and they struggle with power, control, and uncertainty issues, trying to determine how well this relationship will meet their needs. There is a blurred boundary between this stage and the next stage, and certainly there can be pain when one partner decides not to proceed forward and the other wants to. It is perhaps best not to jump into an exclusivity agreement too soon in order to avoid a “mini-marriage” (a monogamous union that is not yet based on reality, and therefore has a fairly high potential for failure, and therefore a fairly high potential for pain).


Stage 3 – “Decision Process” (also known as “pre-commitment”). As time goes on and the relationship deepens, it is natural and appropriate to ask “what is the nature of this relationship?” You have gone beyond sincere interest, and both parties have become relatively certain that there is something they want out of this relationship, and hope it will continue, but have not yet clarified exactly what it is or what form it will take. Because of our many insecurities, this stage often prematurely jumps into “commitment,” even though there are still a lot of unanswered questions. This stage is often exclusive, but does not have to be (much depends on the nature of the partners). The important thing is to consciously recognize that this stage involves a deeper level of decision-making than the “sincere interest” stage, but is not yet a true commitment (either party is still free to “unchoose”). This stage can last from six months to ten years or more, and may involve some breakups and getting back together. The determining factor is readiness and certainty, not time.

Phase 3 – “Committed/Conscious Relationship” (post-dating). In this phase the focus is on further building and deepening the relationship with the understanding that both parties want it to last forever. Note that there are many kinds of relationships, and many kinds of commitments, and both of these things can change with time. Committed relationships in our culture are usually sexually exclusive, but are not necessarily so. One problem to be aware of is the prevalence of “non-consensual non-monogamy,” i.e. both parties claim to be exclusive, but one or both are not. This usually results in pain, sooner or later. Getting to high emotional maturity is the key to making conscious relationship choices that both parties can live with. Continued personal growth within the committed relationship is important: the end of “dating” should not be the end of growth!

And the answer is…

Here is my answer to Teresa’s question about “how soon to be exclusive?”

Teresa’s chances for success in a relationship are hindered by her limiting beliefs. Specifically, her unspoken belief that “exclusivity is the only way and it must happen soon” is keeping her from enjoying the present moment with her friend.

Teresa has known this person for only five months. This is just barely out of the “infatuation” stage. She needs more time to know him before she can make a commitment, and becoming exclusive before making a commitment only sets one up for future failure and pain. This is the classic “mini-marriage.”

Being non-exclusive in the early stages of a relationship is a good idea. It allows both people to have a more realistic assessment of each other and of the relationship while also getting to know others. Being exclusive too early limits your experience and limits your options. Teresa should see non-exclusivity as an opportunity (to get it right this time), and not a drawback.

Another of her limiting beliefs is that “exclusivity is an all or nothing thing.” The fact is that there is a whole continuum of things it could mean, and everyone can have a different idea. Each relationship can be free to define it for themselves.

One meaning is “you can’t date other people.” Ellen Fein and Sherrie Schneider in their book The Rules: Time Tested Secrets for Capturing the Heart of Mr. Right say “Unless you’re engaged, date others.” I think this is good advice, though many people do not follow it. Restrictions (“you can’t date others”) only cause resentment, and unless there is a firm commitment there really is no commitment. Dating others until marriage is assured makes a lot of sense.

However, you probably will find this is difficult, because the person you are interested in is probably insecure and will want exclusivity from you. Things you can say to de-fuse this include “I value my freedom,” “I don’t want to make any mistakes,” etc. to buy time. You are not rejecting the other person or saying that a primary relationship is out of the question, but you are keeping your options open until he or she (and you) are truly ready to commit. If they love you they will continue to see you (and even want more of you).

Another meaning of exclusivity is “you can’t have sex with other people.” Note that this is different from “you can’t date other people” (because it’s possible to date someone without having sex…). One reason for not having sex with other people is to allow you to have safe unprotected sex with your partner. Unfortunately, more often the reason is insecurity.

Until you have an agreement for sexual exclusivity, you should assume the relationship is not exclusive and always use a condom. It is best to wait to have unprotected sex until you trust each other enough to make an agreement about this. Such an agreement (for sexual exclusivity) should be based on mutual desire and trust (which takes time to build), not on insecurity and jealousy. In particular, you need to trust the person enough to believe that if they want to have unprotected sex with another person they will not do so without discussing it with you first.

Teresa’s desire for exclusivity seems to be based on insecurity. She wants it too soon, she equates it with love, and she invests it with her pride (“I would not be true to myself if I did that”). Once it is invested with pride, it becomes rigid and becomes a demand, and no one likes demands placed on them. The mature thing is to be aware of and discuss (at an appropriate time) the degree of exclusivity, the pros and cons of varying degrees, the comfort zones of the two partners, and find a negotiated solution that works for the present but may change in the future.

Basically it seems to me that Teresa wants to put him in prison, and this is not love. She claims it to be love, but it is actually fear. Fear is natural, of course, given all the bad experiences so many people have had, but acting out of fear does not make things better.

Basically most people are unsure, uncertain, ambivalent, “not ready,” etc. because “Relationship” (with a capital “R”) is such a life threatening thing. Some people reduce their uncertainty by jumping into an exclusive relationship, and it seems this is what Teresa is prone to do. This frequently does not change the underlying ambivalence, and often the outcome is failure later on down the line. Others take it slow, and Teresa probably should too. Wanting something deeper is good and natural, but the way to get there is to enjoy the moment, allow it to happen (or not happen) naturally, and not press for the end result too soon.

Also, Teresa needs to consider how important this particular person is, and how much she is willing to stretch to accommodate his needs/limits (and the same goes for him with her). When there’s a lot of true love going on, then both people stretch to accommodate each other’s needs/limits. If they can find a common path, moment to moment, then the relationship can last.

Source by Randy Hurlburt

Leave a Reply